Mark Watts Harrison County Court Judge

Great to work with them. MYERS AND GRIFFIS, JJ., NOT PARTICIPATING. The special judge stated in his opinion that he reviewed the trial transcripts and the evidence presented before making his decision. His term began on Jan. 1, 2019. Alison Baker and Mark Watts are candidates for County Court Seat 1 in Harrison County, For the Harrison County school board — Steven Ramsey and Crystal Wingo are candidates for District 1. "This was a great forum to be able to talk to people because a lot of the time, people don't get access to judges.

Harrison County District Judge

An objective standard is used in reviewing whether a judge should have recused himself. Skip to Main Content. Jessica was born in 1988 and Megan was born in 1992. This is a review for a lawyers business in Harrison County, MS: "After a bad experience with one lawyer, I switched to this one on a reccommendation. The general election is on November 8, 2022. He shut down the other lawyers claims and cut to the chase to cut through the lies and get it over with. Family Law (divorce and child custody). WLOX) - Tuesday night is your chance to hear from the candidates in two upcoming judicial races. DID THE SPECIAL JUDGE ERR IN GRANTING PRIMARY CUSTODY OF THE CHILDREN TO MARK WATTS? According to Mark's testimony, he admitted that Hollie would be better equipped to handle certain issues as the girls matured. They sit up on a bench and don't get to talk to the litigants.

Mark Watts Harrison County Judge Hype

McMILLIN, C. J., KING AND SOUTHWICK,, BRIDGES, THOMAS, IRVING AND CHANDLER, JJ., CONCUR. HAPPENING TONIGHT: Hear from four judicial candidates at Gulfport forum. Program Registration. In Jackson County — Jennifer Harris and Stacie Zorn are candidates for County Court Judge, Seat 1.

Mark Watts Harrison County Judge Dredd

1966), the supreme court stated that a year long advisement by the chancellor was "not of itself erroneous and certainly was not reversible error" and that the length of time is utilized within the chancellor's discretion. Return to Staff Directory. In weighing this factor in favor of Mark, the special judge found that Mark has an extended family living in the area who would be supportive. We find it inexplicable as to why the special judge found in favor of Mark on this factor.

Forms and Applications. However, Hollie's initial complaint for divorce alleged adultery and, although the adultery grounds were later withdrawn, there were subtle references throughout the trial to an improper relationship between Mark and his secretary. Furthermore, we find the special judge placed too much weight on a statement Hollie supposedly made declaring that she would move from Mississippi and take the children. Standing Committees.

We are not substituting our judgment for the special judge, but we find that he placed too much importance on certain facts and disregarded others in deciding to award Mark custody. We must now review the evidence and testimony presented at trial under each Albright factor to determine whether the ruling by the special judge was supported by the record. Watts, the ruling said, did not dispute the claims and agreed to the fine and reprimand for violating the state law on judicial requirements. Prior to establishing Hornsby Watts, PLLC, Mark was an attorney at Phelps Dunbar, LLP for three years and Brown Buchanan for 1. More expensive, but they put my mind at ease during a very tough time during my divorce and got the job done without dragging it out the way other area lawyers seem to do. Since we have found that reversal is warranted on the custody issue, we also reverse the holding with regard to alimony, since the presence of children is a factor in the chancellor's decision concerning an award of alimony. The special judge awarded custody of the children to Mark with liberal visitation to Hollie, denied alimony to Hollie, ordered Hollie to pay child support, and ordered the division of marital assets and liabilities. The commission said it did not find any clear evidence that would have warranted his removal from office. Since Hollie brought up the issue of recusal only after the case was decided against her, we find she effectively acquiesced to the judge hearing her case. In Hodge v. Hodge, 186 So. At the forum, each candidate was given about 3 minutes to respond to questions about relevant topics in the community.

July 22, 2024
How Much Is Bail For Molestation